31 January 2007

What the Left really thinks about the military

This article by William Arkin at the Washington Post reminds us of how liberals really view the military.

These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President's handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect.

Through every Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order.

Sure it is the junior enlisted men who go to jail, but even at anti-war protests, the focus is firmly on the White House and the policy. We just don't see very man "baby killer" epithets being thrown around these days, no one in uniform is being spit upon.

So, we pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?


Mr. Arkin must not have heard about Corporal Joshua Sparling from the 82nd Airborne, a recent amputee who showed up at last weekend's "peace" protests in Washington DC to counter-protest. Myron Pitts from FayObserver.com writes about how protesters spit on Corporal Sparling.

Sparling says the peace protestors were anything but peaceful. He was called names, cussed at and physically threatened, he says.

“The majority were being negative to us,” he says. “A minority were just walking by and saying, ‘peace.’ ”

On Tuesday morning, he was telling his story on “Fox & Friends,” the FoxNews network’s morning show. He told the Fox anchors that he was spit on. (He denies a report in the New York Times that he spit back.)

“I’m sick of everybody going and saying they’re looking out for me,” he says of anti-war protesters. “It was my choice to volunteer.”

23 January 2007

Terror-free Oil

Sorry it's been a little while since my last post. It's been a little hectic with family visiting and travel for work. Here's an article about a gas station in Omaha, NE, that is claiming to sell terror-free oil.

A southwest Omaha gas station now named Terror-Free Oil is intended to send a message that consumers who buy gasoline refined from crude oil from countries associated with terrorism "are purchasing our own demise," said the spokesman of a group that will own and run the former Sinclair station.

"The easiest thing for people to do is to not purchase their gasoline from companies that purchase oil from the Middle East," said Joe Kaufman, spokesman of the Florida-based group, also called Terror-Free Oil, founded about six months ago.


While it's doubtful that one gas station will make a dent in the country's use of crude oil from the Middle East, I like that they've got the guts to take a stand. Wish more companies did.

13 January 2007

Falcons win nailbiter


They did it again! Air Force beat Wyoming by hitting a layup at the buzzer to win by 2. Read all about it here.

Warren Nolan has a great site that tracks all kinds of college basketball streaks and records for the season, along with team and conference RPIs. It's updated all the time. You'll notice how many lists Air Force is on. This is turning out to be an amazing season.

Christians in China

This is a theme that I plan on covering quite a bit in the near future. While on Christmas vacation, I bought a book titled "Jesus in Beijing", by David Aikman. I've only read a few pages so far, but it is a great book. It is amazing how Christianity is spreading throughout China, even in the Communist Party. When I begin reading it, I will give summaries of each chapter here.

So it was interesting when I saw this article last week, right after I had gotten the book. Journal Chretien tells of how Chinese police raided a Bible study meeting in a Communist Party school on 1 January. This came after the Chinese government admitted that there are now 130 million Christians in China.

"On January 1, 2007 a group of Christians gathered in an office in the Party School where the cadres of the Communist Party in Baoding City are trained to celebrate New Year by studying the Bible," the [China Aid Association] CAA said. However, "they were besieged and raided by local Public Security Bureau officers," the group added.

It said over 40 Christians were taken away for questioning, but that most of them were released in the evening. Those released several days later included the host of the Bible study group and the Party School’s Vice President Geng Sude and prominent Beijing activist Li Baiguang, CAA said.

CAA said it also established that on January 4, local police attacked a Christian gathering in Fangcheng County of Henan province.

"Three Christians were brought to the police station. Two of them were released the same day, while the other one, brother An Wenqing, a house church seminary lecturer, was released on January 5 after being interrogated for 14 hours by the police," CAA added.

However despite the attacks, Christianity continues to spread in China said CAA, citing official sources.

"Mr. Yie Xiaowen, the director of the Chinese State Administration for Religious Affairs, said in two internal meetings held in Beijing University and Chinese Academy of Social Science respectively, that the number of Christians in China has reached 130 million now, including 20 million Catholics. The Chinese government often underestimates the number of religious believers in its officially released figure."

Bob Fu, a former house church pastor and current CAA president, told BosNewsLife that, "The unprecedented growth of the Chinese church has happened under ceaseless persecution." He said his supporters, "pray that China will realize true religious freedom soon."

09 January 2007

Air Force stages amazing comeback!!!


Down by 21 at one point in the first half, Air Force (15-1) rallied in the second to win by 8 points against New Mexico. The Lobos were on fire during the first half, hitting 3 after 3. And the Falcons couldn't have been colder. In fact, they didn't reach 10 points until there were only 6:52 left in the half. The only bright point in the first half was that the Lobos were racking up the fouls, so that Air Force was in double bonus by the end of the half. And the fouls continued into the second half. New Mexico ended up with 20 fouls and 3 players with 4 fouls each. The Falcons took advantage of it, hitting 21 of 23 from the line. Air Force's biggest lead was 12, occurring several times.

The win extends 15th-ranked Air Force's home winning streak to 25, still third-best in the nation. It also extended their winning streak to 12, second-best in the nation. And their 15 wins give Air Force the third-most wins in the nation.

UPDATE: 21:17: Here is the Albuquerque Tribune's take on the game.

06 January 2007

Air Force wins 11th straight


Air Force is on fire! Earlier this week, they broke Colorado State's 9 game winning streak to extend their own winning streak to 10. Today, they beat UNLV, who had a 10-game winning streak, 56-50 to make it 11 straight wins. It also extended their home winning streak to 24, third-best in the nation. Their 11-game winning streak is also third-best in the nation. By holding UNLV to 50, Air Force will improve their tenth-best 56.1 points allowed average.


UPDATE (6 Jan 07, 22:23)The Gazette has a good article about the game.

04 January 2007

Air Force wins 10th straight


Air Force won its 10th straight last night in its conference opener against Colorado State. Both teams went into the game with a streak of 9 wins. It turned out to be one of its toughest games yet. Think of it as an early lesson for going into the conference schedule in the MWC, which had a great year against non-conference opponents. The Rocky Mountain News has the story. Photo by AP.

Both came in dripping with experience and confidence. And both played with impressive skill and passion, sharing the ball and taking well-conceived shots before a loud, appreciative crowd of 7,280.

"Our players have embraced playing on the road, and it served us well (Wednesday night)," said Air Force coach Jeff Bzdelik, whose expression was more relief than joy. "I cannot say enough about our players. How many teams in the top 150 teams in the country have played only six games in their home arena and have a record like we have?"

03 January 2007

Proper posture

In honor of the beginning of the new PGA tour season...

Sign posted at a golf club in Arizona:

BACK STRAIGHT, KNEES BENT, FEET SHOULDER WIDTH APART.
FORM A LOOSE GRIP.
KEEP YOUR HEAD DOWN.
AVOID A QUICK BACK SWING.
STAY OUT OF THE WATER.
TRY NOT TO HIT ANYONE.
IF YOU ARE TAKING TOO LONG, PLEASE LET OTHERS GO AHEAD OF YOU.
DON'T STAND DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF OTHERS.
QUIET PLEASE... WHILE OTHERS ARE PREPARING TO GO.
DON'T TAKE EXTRA STROKES.
And then...
Well done. Now flush the urinal, go outside, and tee off.

01 January 2007

Coincidence?

I haven't done an independent investigation on this, but if true, it explains a lot (kudos to Jon L. for this one)...

Many will recall that on July 8, 1947, witnesses claim an "unidentified flying object" with five aliens aboard -- sex unknown -- crashed on a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico. This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the US Air Force and the federal government.

However, you may well NOT know that in the month of March 1948, exactly nine months after that historic day, Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.; Hillary Rodham; John F. Kerry; William Jefferson Clinton; Howard Dean; Harry Reid; Nancy Pelosi; Dianne Feinstein; Charles E. Schumer; and Barbara Boxer were born.

Incoming Chair of Judiciary Committee admits to breaking ethics rules


Michelle Malkin has a great catch at her blog on a statement at the House Ethics Committee. The statement details how congressional staffers of Rep. John Conyers, the incoming chair of the Judiciary Committee, "performed campaign activity on official time and in some instances using official resources, and that some staff members may have been compelled to do campaign work or personal work for Representative Conyers."

But because he cooperated with the investigation, the Ethics Committee is going to let him off with a slap on the wrist, provided he complies with the following conditions:


1. Prohibiting his personal congressional staff (other than his Chief of Staff) from performing any campaign-related work, including work done on a voluntary basis, during the 110th Congress, unless the staff member takes a paid position on his campaign while on leave without pay status and obtains prior written approval from the Committee.

2. Informing staff members in writing of the prohibition set forth above against the voluntary performance of campaign work.

3. Distributing a memorandum to each member of his personal congressional staff which clearly sets forth all House rules concerning (1) the performance of campaign and other non-official work by congressional staff members and (2) the prohibition against the performance of any campaign-related work being conducted in either his congressional or district offices. Additionally, this memorandum will explicitly state that the performance of campaign or other non-official work by staff members may not be required as a condition of their employment.

4. Directing that meetings of his personal congressional staff be held annually in which the House rules concerning staff participation in campaign activities are discussed and explained. In addition, a description of these rules will be made a part of the orientation for all new staff employees.

5. Continuing to maintain the detailed time-keeping system initiated by Rep. Conyers during the course of the Committee’s inquiry.

6. Requiring that all members of his congressional staff attend a briefing conducted by Committee counsel on the application of, and compliance with, applicable House rules concerning the performance of campaign and other non-official work by congressional staff members.


Wonder how many Mainstream Media outlets will bury this story (or even run it at all)? A quick check of 4 of the major newspapers' websites (NY Times, LA Times, Chicago Tribune, and the Washington Times) yielded only one hit for "John Conyers Ethics Committee". The Tribune ran the AP story, but nothing original.